Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722707 Paweł Forysiuk <tuxator@xxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuxator@xxxxx --- Comment #2 from Paweł Forysiuk <tuxator@xxxxx> 2011-07-16 18:26:37 EDT --- This is an unoffical review of mingw-libvorbis package. I'm still looking for a Sponsor. rpmlint mingw-libvorbis-1.3.2-1.fc15.src.rpm mingw-libvorbis.spec ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libvorbis-1.3.2-1.fc15.noarch.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libvorbis-debuginfo-1.3.2-1.fc15.noarch.rpm mingw-libvorbis.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ogg -> Egg, Org, Soggy mingw-libvorbis.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bitrates -> nitrates, bit rates, bit-rates mingw-libvorbis.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kbps -> bps, kips, k bps mingw-libvorbis.src: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-07-17 mingw32-libvorbis.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ogg -> Egg, Org, Soggy mingw32-libvorbis.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bitrates -> nitrates, bit rates, bit-rates mingw32-libvorbis.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kbps -> bps, kips, k bps mingw32-libvorbis.noarch: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-07-17 mingw32-libvorbis-debuginfo.noarch: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-07-17 mingw32-libvorbis-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 6 warnings. + rpmlint errors are false positives here. + The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The spec file name match the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding native Fedora package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: c870b9bd5858a0ecb5275c14486d9554 libvorbis-1.3.2.tar.gz c870b9bd5858a0ecb5275c14486d9554 /home/pawel/rpmbuild/SOURCES/libvorbis-1.3.2.tar.gz + The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Directory ownership sane + Filenames are valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review