[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776


jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx  2007-01-06 21:32 EST -------
Doesn't build, missing gecko-sharp, gconf-sharp, and %find_lang doesn't find any
langs.

A spec that addresses these:
http://fedorared.org/repos/rpmbuild/SPECS/mono-tools.spec

The Summary doesn't seem to go with the %description, these are mono tools and
not necessarily a documentation system. The description in the included README
seems closer.

URL is 404'd.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]