Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674114 --- Comment #10 from Sebastian Dziallas <sebastian@xxxxxxxx> 2011-07-11 17:48:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Well, if you give me some unresolvable reasons why appjet requires its own > > framework you might convince me. But I don't see any reason to not move to > > latest rhino even if the patches are unavoidable. > > Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. So, let me try pitching it this > way: > > Etherpad's Appjet requires both a modified version of yuicompressor (and hence > rhino). I'm not comfortable arguing that these patches won't affect anybody > else using rhino -- simply because I don't know. I have tried compiling > etherpad against upstream versions of rhino and yuicompressor, but it throws > errors during the compilation. > > I feel that it'd be fair to argue that in this case patched compat packages for > both rhino and yuicompressor could be doable. > > Did I convice you? :) And before I forget, upstream has been notified awhile ago, so there'd be tracking of the situation: https://github.com/ether/pad/issues/173 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review