Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-11 07:23:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > I want to make change /usr/bin/rdoc to use alternatives mechanize and to give > > high priority on ones installed by rubygem-rdoc (if this package is going to be > > reviewed). > > Could you be more specific? Are you speaking about this [1] alternatives? Yes. > Because it seems to me that easier way would be to patch the original > /usr/bin/rdoc to load the RDoc gem if it is available, otherwise continue with > the original RDoc. E.g. there would be typical RubyGems loader on the top of > the /usr/bin/rdoc and if it fails (no RubyGems, no RDoc gem), then it would > continue with the original one. In this way, people will have to once remove rubygem-rdoc every time they want to use the original rdoc and it seems unpleasant to me. > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Alternatives -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review