[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820

--- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-11 03:41:20 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I want to make change /usr/bin/rdoc to use alternatives mechanize and to give
> high priority on ones installed by rubygem-rdoc (if this package is going to be
> reviewed).

Could you be more specific? Are you speaking about this [1] alternatives?
Because it seems to me that easier way would be to patch the original
/usr/bin/rdoc to load the RDoc gem if it is available, otherwise continue with
the original RDoc.  E.g. there would be typical RubyGems loader on the top of
the /usr/bin/rdoc and if it fails (no RubyGems, no RDoc gem), then it would
continue with the original one.


[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Alternatives

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]