Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #44 from Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-03 06:16:14 EDT --- Rosen, what's the state of the fparser changes, have they been upstreamed, yet? You can of course put the SRPM file in your subversion (though my take is that binary package stuff generally does not belong in a subversion repository), but it will not be the source from which Fedora builds its packages, we want tarballs that we put on a Fedora mirror. Likewise the authoritative spec file will reside in Fedora's git repo, but you are obviously free to include a copy in your repository. I hope I find some time to package 0.4.0 next week, but it's busy atm. Peter, can you start a first review cycle so that we can straighten out rough edges? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review