Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712624 --- Comment #5 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-30 16:34:34 EDT --- Ok, I've started working through the guidelines. Here's the rpmlint output from all packages generated by rpmbuild: $ rpmlint aeskulap-*.rpm aeskulap.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gtkmm aeskulap.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glademm -> glade mm, glade-mm, glade aeskulap.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gconfmm -> confirm, conformal, conformism aeskulap.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch7: %{name}-configure.patch aeskulap.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gtkmm aeskulap.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glademm -> glade mm, glade-mm, glade aeskulap.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gconfmm -> confirm, conformal, conformism None of the spelling-error's are real aeskulap.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/aeskulap.schemas Looking at my system this seems to be the right place, perhaps rpmlint should be updated.. aeskulap.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/aeskulap-0.2.2/NEWS We knew this one would be a problem, I think it's safe to ignore. aeskulap.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary aeskulap I assume this is a GUI only program in which case a man page would not be expected? aeskulap.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre rm aeskulap.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm This obviously are part of the %gconf... macros which we're not responsible for so they can be ignored. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 11 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review