[Bug 701079] Review Request: wmSun - Rise/Set time of Sun in a dockapp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701079

Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?

--- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-30 13:29:07 EDT ---
Review:

+ OK
- NA
? Issue

+ Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
+ Spec file matches base package name.
+ Spec has consistant macro usage.
+ Meets Packaging Guidelines.
+ License
+ License field in spec matches
+ License file included in package
+ Spec in American English
+ Spec is legible.
+ Sources match upstream md5sum:
[ankur@ankur rpmbuild]$ md5sum wmSun-1.03.tar.gz SOURCES/wmSun-1.03.tar.gz 
34a2ea132f1a04e18be2d93abce40722  wmSun-1.03.tar.gz
34a2ea132f1a04e18be2d93abce40722  SOURCES/wmSun-1.03.tar.gz


- Package needs ExcludeArch
+ BuildRequires correct
- Spec handles locales/find_lang
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
+ Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
+ Package has a correct %clean section.
+ Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ Package is code or permissible content.
- Doc subpackage needed/used.
+ Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
- .so files in -devel subpackage.
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
- .la files are removed.

? Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
^^^

It is a GUI, isn't it? I haven't seen a desktop file in the source. If you can,
please create one and add it as an extra source. Do also send this upstream.
(Only if it is a GUI of course.)

+ Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
+ Package has no duplicate files in %files.
+ Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
+ Package owns all the directories it creates.
? No rpmlint output.
[ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint ../SPECS/wmSun.spec wmSun-1.03-2.fc15.src.rpm
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm
../SPECS/wmSun.spec:51: W: macro-in-%changelog %{buildroot}
wmSun.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dockapp -> dock app, dock-app,
paddock
wmSun.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dockapp -> dock app,
dock-app, paddock
wmSun.src:51: W: macro-in-%changelog %{buildroot}
wmSun.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dockapp -> dock app, dock-app,
paddock
wmSun.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dockapp -> dock app,
dock-app, paddock
wmSun.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/wmSun-1.03/COPYING
wmSun.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dockapp -> dock app, dock-app,
paddock
wmSun.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dockapp -> dock app,
dock-app, paddock
wmSun.src:51: W: macro-in-%changelog %{buildroot}
wmSun-debuginfo.i686: E: empty-debuginfo-package
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 9 warnings.

^^^ 

-> I see you're using the -s (strip) option while installing. Please do not do
that.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Debuginfo#Useless_or_incomplete_debuginfo_packages_due_to_packaging_issues

-> The macro in changelog is ignorable. 

+ final provides and requires are sane:
[ankur@ankur result]$ review-req-check 
== wmSun-1.03-2.fc16.i686.rpm ==
Provides:
wmSun = 1.03-2.fc16
wmSun(x86-32) = 1.03-2.fc16

Requires:
libX11.so.6  
libXext.so.6  
libXpm.so.4  
libc.so.6  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)  
libm.so.6  
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)  
rtld(GNU_HASH)  

== wmSun-1.03-2.fc16.src.rpm ==
Provides:

Requires:
libXext-devel  
libXpm-devel  

== wmSun-debuginfo-1.03-2.fc16.i686.rpm ==
Provides:
wmSun-debuginfo = 1.03-2.fc16
wmSun-debuginfo(x86-32) = 1.03-2.fc16

Requires:


SHOULD Items:

+ Should build in mock.
+ Should build on all supported archs
- Should function as described.
+ Should have sane scriptlets.
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
+ Should have dist tag
+ Should package latest version
- check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)

Issues:

1. buildroot tag isn't required any more
2. the clean section isn't required any more
3. Please report the incorrect FSF address upstream.
4. Please remove the -s flag from install. It should then generate debuginfo. 

Small, easily correctable issues :)

Thanks,
Ankur.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]