Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648053 Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-30 11:27:52 EDT --- - rpmlint checks return: libMicro.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/download/Project+libmicro/Source+Archives/libmicro-0.4.0.tar.gz <urlopen error [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer> The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. libMicro.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+libmicro/ <urlopen error [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer> The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. Is this upstream still valid? libMicro.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary multiview Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. libMicro.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bench Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. If these exist, include them. Other than that and the awk spelling, it's quiet. ??? package meets naming guidelines If upstream is libmicro, why libMicro? OK package meets packaging guidelines OK license ( ) OK, text in %doc, matches source OK spec file legible, in am. english See above, can't check! source matches upstream OK on x86_64 package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR OK no locales OK not relocatable OK owns all directories that it creates OK no duplicate files OK permissions ok OK %clean ok OK macro use consistent OK code, not content OK no need for -docs OK nothing in %doc affects runtime OK no need for .desktop file Mock build to chck BRs in progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review