Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717502 --- Comment #6 from German Ruiz <germanrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-30 00:16:52 EDT --- Here the files with the corrections... SPEC: http://lletelier.fedorapeople.org/i4uc/i4uc.spec SRPM: http://lletelier.fedorapeople.org/i4uc/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.src.rpm RPM_F15_32bits: http://lletelier.fedorapeople.org/i4uc/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.i686.rpm RPM_F15_64bits: http://lletelier.fedorapeople.org/i4uc/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm rpmlint outputs: rpmlint -i SPECS/i4uc.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -i RPMS/i686/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.i686.rpm i4uc.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary i4uc-gtk Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint -i SRPMS/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -i SPECS/i4uc.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -i SRPMS/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -i RPMS/x86_64/i4uc-0.5.6-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm i4uc.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary i4uc-gtk Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review