Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716808 --- Comment #2 from Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen.nitdgp@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-27 21:50:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > [X] Package name - ok. > [?] Package group not specified. done > [X] Build successful - ok. > [?] $ rpmlint SRPMS/grapefruit-0.1a3-1.20110627svn31.fc14.src.rpm > > grapefruit.src: W: invalid-url Source0: grapefruit-0.1a3svn31.tar.gz > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > -> Please provide valid source URL. I export this source using svn and I already specified how I made tarball > [X] $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/grapefruit-0.1a3-1.20110627svn31.fc14.noarch.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > -> ok. > > [X] License ASL 2.0 - ok > [?] md5sum/sha1sum of the sources in the SRPM and the one accessible > from URL - https://code.google.com/p/grapefruit/downloads/list - do NOT > match. may be because I exported latest upstream. > > [X] Install/Un-install - ok. > > Overall good. Nevertheless, please do fix the minor glitches like RPM groups > and source URL. Updated SPEC : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/grapefruit/grapefruit.spec Updated SRPM : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/grapefruit/grapefruit-0.1a3-2.20110627svn31.fc15.src.rpm Thanks for reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review