Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot - Gives a fake root environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220888 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-04 22:12 EST ------- I disagree that there was a consensus in the way you interprete it. :) There was only one member that insisted on turning the current buildroot recommendation to a mandatory item, while the rest was convinced that the "preferred buildroot" isn't really a good one as it breaks multi-arch builds, which is a far more common case than multi-user builds (Note: We are always talking of the same package with the same nevr!!!). To quote: The reviewers need to be whacked with a clue-stick. A working (non-broken) buildroot is *not* a blocker." > we should keep what is in the Guidelines; and doing otherwise is therefore a > blocker This is not a MUST item, so this can't block the package. And if you still think strongly about it you can and should revive the discussion on fedora-packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review