Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-04 13:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > To clarify comment 4, my question is should the livecd-tools-installer also own > the /etc/livecd directory even though it *might* be installed at the same time > as fedora-livecd (sometimes it might, sometimes not). I guess that would work > > I guess I'm fine with just having fedora-livecd owning /etc/livecd; we can > always fix up things later if there are side effects. Standard soapbox answer to such kind of questions: - If several packages share a common directory, and if they depend on each other in a strict hierarchy, then letting the "root package" own this dir is sufficient. - If they don't depend on each other in a strict hierarchy, all of the packages must own this directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review