Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted - Twisted is an event-based framework for internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221310 kevin@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2007-01-04 00:34 EST ------- Not sure this needs a formal review, but I can do so if need be. Questions/Issues: 1. What are these for? upstream/old packages? Obsoletes: %{origname} <= %{version}-%{release} Provides: %{origname} = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: twisted <= %{version}-%{release} Provides: twisted = %{version}-%{release} 2. Should both of those Obsoletes be just "<" and not "<=" ? Surely you don't want to obsolete the very version you are providing? 3. Note that the old python-twisted package has: Obsoletes: python-Twisted < 1.3.0 Provides: python-Twisted = %{version}-%{release} Should that be carried forward? Can any Obsolete/Provides/Metapackage savvy folks look this over? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review