Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710699 Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel.seyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel.seyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-18 19:12:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > [x] Rpmlint output: perl-Gtk2-Unique.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libunique -> lib unique, lib-unique, uniqueness perl-Gtk2-Unique.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libunique -> lib unique, lib-unique, uniqueness perl-Gtk2-Unique.src: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-06-19 perl-Gtk2-Unique.src:31: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 31, tab: line 1) perl-Gtk2-Unique.spec:31: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 31, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. As said before, the spelling mistakes are flase positives, rpmlint treats changelog entries as being done at noon so the changelog-time-in-future is a flase positive as well. Please use either tabs or spaces in your spec file (I prefer spaces but the choice is up to you). > The package is licensed "GPL+ or Artistic" but the License field of the spec > says "LGPLv2+". Where did this come from ? Spec file now says "GPL+ or Artistic" APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review