Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #11 from Elio Maldonado Batiz <emaldona@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-17 14:52:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I see this is now emaldonado's package? Can you have a look at this so we can > get it put to bed? Thanks! Hi Jon, What is the propsal in question that you would like me to comment on? The nss build system has changed substantially since you last reprted problems. Since 3.12.4 and Fedora-12 we have split nss into three packages: nss-util, nss-softokn, and nss. I'm sure that an rpmlinit run againts the latest srps will show different results. Quite a few error message still show up and I will be happy to discuss them with you. Some are in my list of things to fix but I am waiting to an opportune time to tacke them. By opprtune I mean very early in the relase cycle so that I can work with maintainers of packages that depend on nss to ensure we don't break them or anyone else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review