Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713320 --- Comment #5 from Chris Lalancette <clalance@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-15 09:38:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > oz seems to make sense from a project name perspective. Maybe Chris has a > different viewpoint. I will provide review of this package. Yeah, I would go with oz as the package name. Although this is part of the aeolus project, my feeling is that oz has use outside of the project. PÃdraig, once you fix the issues that Steve found, I would appreciate patches to the .spec file upstream. At least then we can keep it mostly in-sync with what is in Fedora. Thanks, Chris Lalancette -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review