Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705917 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-14 13:33:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The first warning should be fine. I think the second is bacause rpmlint is not > aware of the .xz extension, so this should also be fine. No, the .xz extension is understood. The warning just indicates that I didn't provide a URL, like http://some.web.site/cmuclmtk-man.tar.xz. That's because I wrote the man pages myself... > The other question I have is about the license. The RPM specification lists > "MIT and BSD." I'd like an expert to review the particular license or point to > where the text has already been approved. That information comes from the top-level "COPYING" file. And, argh! I missed the "for research purposes only" clause in the MIT-like part of that file. I will write to upstream and see if that clause can be removed. If not, then this package cannot go into Fedora. Bummer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review