Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712949 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-13 14:45:26 EDT --- These two files need to be in the main package, not in devel. %{_libdir}/libgoa-1.0.so.0 %{_libdir}/libgoa-backend-1.0.so.0 A few bits that need to be fixed up. + rpmlint output rpmlint gnome-online-accounts-3.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm gnome-online-accounts-3.1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm gnome-online-accounts-devel-3.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm gnome-online-accounts.spec gnome-online-accounts.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libgoa-backend-1.0.so.0.0.0 gnome-online-accounts.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libgoa-1.0.so.0.0.0 gnome-online-accounts.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gnome-online-accounts-3.1.0/README gnome-online-accounts-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libgoa-backend-1.0.so.0 libgoa-backend-1.0.so.0.0.0 gnome-online-accounts-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libgoa-1.0.so.0 libgoa-1.0.so.0.0.0 gnome-online-accounts-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/goa-1.0/goabackend/goaeditablelabel.h 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 2 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + latest version packaged - %doc includes license file doesn't include COPYING, README can be dropped as its empty + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm a98926706647d142175a0bcaf0e40fe9 gnome-online-accounts-3.1.0.tar.bz2 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3128535 + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + Package perserves timestamps on install Permissions on files must be set properly - %defattr line missing in devel subpackage + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package runtime + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream to include it n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a non -devel packages should require fully versioned base n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin + Package should have man files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review