Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: softhsm - Software version of a PKCS#11 Hardware Security Module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711895 Summary: Review Request: softhsm - Software version of a PKCS#11 Hardware Security Module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/opendnssec/softhsm.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/opendnssec/softhsm-1.2.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: OpenDNSSEC is providing a software implementation of a generic cryptographic device with a PKCS#11 interface, the SoftHSM. SoftHSM is designed to meet the requirements of OpenDNSSEC, but can also work together with other cryptographic products because of the PKCS#11 interface. current rpmlint output: softhsm.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libsofthsm.so libsofthsm.so softhsm.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/softhsm 0700L softhsm-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libsofthsm -> libertinism, softhearted The invalid-soname is something I'm talking to upstream about right now. They changed from a shared library to a module but need to change the install location. Will be fixed in a rebuild when upstream has decided on a place (or else I'll pick one in a day or two) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review