Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711762 HaÃkel GuÃmar <karlthered@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from HaÃkel GuÃmar <karlthered@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-08 11:30:43 EDT --- * i generated a tarball following your instructions in spec, the checksum still differs but i didn't find any difference using diff $ sha1sum generated/osc-132.1.tar.gz 2a1069b422292141740a4d0ba839a3bd9e6ec6c8 $ sha1sum osc-0.132.1.tar.gz ae399f2aeb9108ab5b998731f3473362f2153cd7 $ diff -Naur generated/osc-0.132.1 osc-0.132.1/ <no output> * rpmlint $ rpmlint -iv osc-0.132.1-1.fc15.src.rpm osc.src: I: checking osc.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) openSUSE -> opens Use, open SUSE, open-SUSE The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. osc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Commandline -> Command line, Command-line, Commanding The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. osc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US openSUSE -> opens Use, open SUSE, open-SUSE The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. osc.src: I: checking-url http://www.gitorious.org/opensuse/osc (timeout 10 seconds) osc.src:65: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/osc/complete The %{_libdir} or %{_lib} macro was found in a noarch package in a section that gets included in binary packages. This is most likely an error because these macros are expanded on the build host and their values vary between architectures, probably resulting in a package that does not work properly on all architectures at runtime. Investigate whether the package is really architecture independent or if some other dir/macro should be instead. osc.src: W: invalid-url Source0: osc-0.132.1.tar.gz The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. $ rpmlint -iv /home/haikel/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/osc-0.132.1-1.fc15.noarch.rpm osc.noarch: I: checking osc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) openSUSE -> opens Use, open SUSE, open-SUSE The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. osc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Commandline -> Command line, Command-line, Commanding The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. osc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US openSUSE -> opens Use, open SUSE, open-SUSE The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. osc.noarch: I: checking-url http://www.gitorious.org/opensuse/osc (timeout 10 seconds) osc.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary osc-wrapper.py Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. osc.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary osc_hotshot.py Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. ==> you probably misunderstood me about the /usr/lib64/osc/complete, since it's a non-arch dependent shell script, you should install it in /usr/lib/osc/complete (to be multilib compliant). Besides it won't break anything since shell completion configuration file will search autocompletion helpers in both /usr/lib{,64}/osc/complete * still builds in mock as soon as you fix the completion helper location, i'll approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review