[Bug 711462] Review Request: perl-Fedora-Rebuild - Rebuilds Fedora packages from scratch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711462

--- Comment #3 from Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-07 11:35:39 EDT ---
- rpmlint OK
 perl-Fedora-Rebuild.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary getperlsourcenames
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build ?
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK

rpm -q --provides perl-Fedora-Rebuild
perl(Fedora::Rebuild)  
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Package)  
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Package::StateLock)  
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::RPM)  
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Scheduler)  
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Set::Package)  
perl-Fedora-Rebuild = 0.0.1-1.fc14

rpm -q --requires perl-Fedora-Rebuild
/bin/sh  
/usr/bin/perl  
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)  
perl(Carp)  
perl(Data::Dumper)  
perl(Fedora::Rebuild)  
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Package)  
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Package::StateLock)  
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::RPM)  
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Scheduler)  
perl(Fedora::Rebuild::Set::Package)  
perl(File::Copy)  
perl(File::Path)  
perl(File::Spec)  
perl(IO::Handle)  
perl(Moose)  
perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints)  
perl(MooseX::Types::Moose)  
perl(Proc::SyncExec)  
perl(RPM2)  
perl(RPM::VersionCompare)  
perl(Scalar::Util)  
perl(Thread::Semaphore)  
perl(constant)  
perl(namespace::clean)  
perl(strict)  
perl(threads)  
perl(threads::shared)  
perl(version) >= 0.77
perl(warnings)  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0

resolvedeps-f16 ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.0.1-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 
Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok.

Only problem -> can't be built in rawhide (problem above).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]