[Bug 221188] Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pdns-recursor - Modern, advanced and high performance recursing/non authoritative nameserver


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221188


josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: pdns-       |Review Request: pdns-
                   |recursor - Modern, advanced |recursor - Modern, advanced
                   |and high performance        |and high performance
                   |recursing/non authoritative |recursing/non authoritative
                   |nameserver                  |nameserver




------- Additional Comments From josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-01-02 16:56 EST -------
Here is my review, everything looks good, it built and such.  I haven't yet 
been sponsored and stuff, I'm doing reviews in order to get sponsored.

Must:

-rpmlint ran without errors
[josef@dhcp59-136 ~]$ rpmlint pdns-recursor-3.1.4-1.src.rpm 
[josef@dhcp59-136 ~]$ 
-package conforms to package naming guidlines
-spec file name matches basename
-the package is licensed with an open source compatible license
-package includes license in %doc
-spec file is written in american english
-spec file is legible
-sources match upstream (sha1sum)
d1fa344ec5f2feb12397361f92b011a0cb726d48  pdns-recursor-3.1.4.tar.bz2
-package successfully built on my test box (x86_64)
-no need for exclude arch
-BR are present and make sense
-no libraries, no need to run ldconfig
-not relocatable
-package owns everything it creates
-package does not duplicate files it owns
-file attributes are set appropriatly
-%clean section present and removes buildroot
-consistently uses macros
-contains code
-no large documentation
-files in %doc does not affect runtime of application
-does not contain a pkgconfig file
-does not contain any libraries
-does not have a devel package
-does not contain any .la files
-package does not have a gui
-package does not own files/directories owned by other packages.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]