[Bug 709125] Review Request: obdgpslogger - OBDII and GPS data logger for your car

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709125

--- Comment #4 from Gary Briggs <chunky@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-03 20:04:30 EDT ---
I would like to maintain the spec for as many distributions as possible. I
dream of this making it into currently supported distribution versions as well
as upcoming ones, so I'm inclined to leave the clean stuff there until
distributions that require it are EOL'd.

The requires I left in there are ones that aren't libraries that get linked to;
it's useful that users have the binaries that come in those packages, rather
than just the library packages that rpm automatically figures out.

Is that OK, or will they just be inherited as "Suggests"-type packages from the
libraries that *are* set as requirements?

[In case that was incoherent, an example: RPM will figure out that it requires
libgpsd, but the gpsd daemon itself comes in a separate package that cannot be
inferred from ldd]

I'll fix everything else tonight and push new versions of those files.
Thank-you for the review

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]