Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #45 from Mario Sanchez Prada <msanchez@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-03 17:09:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > [...] > What does it mean for the technical side of the package? My idea is to use the > recent Git commits as patches to make the debug file creation work. Then we > could go ahead with Frogr itself. Once a day we have a separate library, then > it is time to roll up the process again. For now, we should concentrate the > effort to v0.5, even with patches, of course. I'm ok with that, but if it's ok to you, I'd like to help you by providing those specific patches to you in an organized way, after having squashed all those little commits I've been pushing lately, so handling them while packaging would not be a mess. That way I would provide Fedora packagers a very easy way to package frogr in a Fedora compliant way. I propose this becase after so many (small) changes since the 0.5 release, I'm afraid just picking patches and applying them on the fly while packaging could be not that easy for someone not familiar with the project (that is me), What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review