Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710115 --- Comment #4 from ClÃment DAVID <c.david86@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-03 04:13:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://davidclement8298.perso.neuf.fr/jlatexmath.spec SRPM URL: http://davidclement8298.perso.neuf.fr/jlatexmath-0.9.6-2.fc14.src.rpm Patch0 URL: http://davidclement8298.perso.neuf.fr/0001-incorrect-fsf-address.patch Thanks for the review, updated : - Use sed on the spec file to fix class-path-in-manifest - Fixed incoherent-version-in-changelog - Add patch to fix fsf address It pass rpmlint with 3 warnings fixed by comments : jlatexmath.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %{name} jlatexmath.src:11: W: macro-in-comment %{version} jlatexmath.src: W: invalid-url Source0: jlatexmath-src-all-0.9.6.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review