Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw32-win-iconv - iconv |mingw-win-iconv - iconv |implementation using Win32 |implementation using Win32 |API |API --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-02 10:47:47 EDT --- Recently the FPC has approved a change in the packaging guidelines which allows mingw32 packages to use the prefix 'mingw-' to aid in the transition to the mingw-w64 based toolchain. Due to this approval I've updated the spec of this package. Kalev: could you please take a quick look at the updated spec file to see if it's compliant with the new guidelines? After that I'll request a git repo named mingw-win-iconv Spec URL: http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-win-iconv.spec SRPM URL: http://ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-win-iconv-0.0.2-3.fc15.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3106108 * Thu Jun 2 2011 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.0.2-2 - Use the name mingw-win-iconv for the srpm to ease the transition to the mingw-w64 based toolchain - Use the RPM 4.9 dependency generator - Dropped unnecessary tags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review