Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #29 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2011-06-02 10:28:36 EDT --- I ask on IRC how to handle this issue and got some helpful information from Rex Dieter. First of all, it's not possible to bundle the library "silently", i.e. FPC must grant an exception from the no-bundled-libraries policy. Mario (B.), you should ask for such an exception as described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Exceptions I think you could also package a Git snapshot of flicksoup and use it instead of the bundled library. In this case, all changes to the bundled library should of course be pushed to the flicksoup repo so that both source pools are in sync and future updates work smoothly. If the FPC doesn't grant an exception, this is probably the only alternative. (In reply to comment #26) > if I released it > now, I couldn't promise I wouldn't break API/ABI in the next releases That shouldn't be too much of a problem as long as you bump the soname and soversion accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review