Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #27 from Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-02 05:54:13 EDT --- I would keep src/flicksoup files as LGPLv3 if your long term plan/hope is to ship it as a separate library. If you get external patches to src/flicksoup, you don't want to be stuck with GPLv3 licensing the day you want to make it an external library. Apart from that, your plan makes sense to me. Another option might be to install flicksoup as a .so as part of flickr "make install", and to also install .h files. This way, the library can be put in separate lib/-devel subpackages. However, this is not a really good solution, since I'm under the impression that if someone tries to use it, things will break every time frogr gets upgraded. I don't know if this is OK wrt fedora guidelines, but at least your plan makes sense to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review