Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708475 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-01 18:32:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Ok, so pysdm only appears to use SimpleGladeApp.py astepache.py is intended as > a binary, not a library. I'm guessing the pysdm group just pulled in all of the > tepache package instead of just using SimpleGladeApp.py, which BTW, is ALL OVER > THE PLACE in on the web and in other distros. Looks like it's been widely > copied in many projects. Argh. That's the lazy way for the developer to cope with the problem, but it causes all kinds of problems later on. > Also, a problem: > # yum whatprovides /usr/lib/*/site-packages/SimpleGladeApp.py > Loaded plugins: changelog, presto, refresh-packagekit, remove-with-leaves, > rpm-warm-cache > gresistor-0.0.1-17.fc14.noarch : Gnome resistor color code calculator > Repo : fedora > Matched from: > Filename : /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/SimpleGladeApp.py > > I'm assuming that once tepache gets approved that the gresistor maintainer will > have to fix his package, right? Yes. I think the right way to go about this is to file the review request for tepache, then file a bug against gresistor, and make the second bug depend on the first one. That way the gresistor maintainer will be notified when tepache hits the repository. > And this was supposed to be a simple one :) I've thought that a couple of times, too. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review