Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765 --- Comment #7 from Mario BlÃttermann <mariobl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-05-31 14:56:08 EDT --- Many thanks for all the hints and improvements! I've now crowded the old spec file and built a new one based on the one in Git. Spec URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/frogr.spec SRPM URL: http://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/frogr-0.5-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Frogr is a small application for the GNOME desktop that allows users to manage their accounts in the Flickr image hosting website. It supports all the basic tasks, including uploading pictures, adding descriptions, setting tags and managing sets. However, I'm unsure if we need such a changelog. It reflects all the changes due to the software itself, although our package changelog is actually for changes to the package. The packaging guidelines say the following [1]: "Changelog entries should provide a brief summary of the changes done to the package between releases, including noting updating to a new version, adding a patch, fixing other spec sections, note bugs fixed, and CVE's if any. They must never simply contain an entire copy of the source CHANGELOG entries. The intent is to give the user a hint as to what changed in a package update without overwhelming them with the technical details. Links to upstream changelogs can be entered for those who want additional information." Means, we can drop all the changelog entries which also be found in the upstream changelog anyway. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review