[Bug 708934] Review Request: rubygem-pg - A Ruby interface to the PostgreSQL RDBMS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708934

--- Comment #6 from Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-05-31 07:35:47 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > > Imho in license should be postgresql instead of BSD.
> > > 
> > > I have explicitly asked upstream about versions and they state that the content
> > > of BSD file is wrong, but the BSD license is correct. The upstream issue is
> > > referenced in .spec file, so I think we should be OK.
> > > 
> > From your comment (License is not that clear) isn't clear, that you have
> > statement from upstream. Sometimes is in specfile included email, where was
> > license claimed.
> 
> I would expect that reviewer could click on the link on the same line to see
> what is going on, but my expectations might be overly high.
> 
The link could be gone, but the package could still life in some old release.
License must be stated clearly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]