Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708970 --- Comment #2 from VÃt Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-05-31 06:27:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - license field must match actual license ? > I found LGPL without version. See the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing and you will find that if somebody states LGPL, it means actually LGPLv2+ and the short name is LGPLv2+. There is no LGPL short name listed. > - text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc ? > You should add LGPL statement into doc. What is meant by that? I have no license file, so I have nothing to include. I may request that file from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review