[Bug 702846] Review Request: mingw32-gdb - MinGW Windows port of the GDB debugger

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702846

Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-05-30 13:56:41 EDT ---
Fedora review mingw32-gdb-7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm 2011-05-30

+ OK
! needs attention

Scratch Build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3100605

rpmlint:
$ rpmlint mingw32-gdb.spec mingw32-gdb-7.2-1.fc15.src.rpm
mingw32-gdb-7.2-1.fc16.noarch.rpm mingw32-gdb-debuginfo-7.2-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
mingw32-gdb.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided mingw32-gdb-gdbserver
mingw32-gdb-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.

These errors and warnings can be ignored.

+ rpmlint output
+ The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
!   please modify it to anticipate the "MinGW_future" packaging guidelines
    (i.e. rename it to mingw-gdb)
+ The spec file name matches the package base name
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
  Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding
  native Fedora package
+ The package contains the license file (COPYING3 COPYING COPYING.LIB)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum:
  169ed5b088538fa10483177f3035f77c  gtkmm-3.0.1.tar.bz2
  169ed5b088538fa10483177f3035f77c  Download/gtkmm-3.0.1.tar.bz2
+ The package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly
n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
    Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files
    Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Directory ownership sane
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8

! while the built gdb.exe does work on native Windows, wine gdb.exe just hangs.
  I would expect to be able to enter help etc. Since the MinGW project goal is
  to minimize windows use, I think gdb.exe working with wine should be a goal
  if we are to include the mingw32-gdb package in fedora

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]