Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701347 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-05-30 09:38:28 EDT --- Fedora review mingw-gtkmm30-3.0.1-2.fc15.src.rpm 2011-05-30 + OK ! needs attention Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3100290 rpmlint: $ rpmlint mingw-gtkmm30.spec mingw-gtkmm30-3.0.1-2.fc15.src.rpm mingw32-gtkmm30-debuginfo-3.0.1-2.fc16.noarch.rpm mingw32-gtkmm30-3.0.1-2.fc16.noarch.rpm mingw-gtkmm30.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gtkmm mingw32-gtkmm30-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw32-gtkmm30.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw32-gtkmm30-3.0.1/COPYING 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. ! the fsf address issue should be addressed. Did you or do you know whether the native package maintainer has contacted upstream? ! rpmlint output + The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the package base name + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding native Fedora package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 169ed5b088538fa10483177f3035f77c gtkmm-3.0.1.tar.bz2 169ed5b088538fa10483177f3035f77c Download/gtkmm-3.0.1.tar.bz2 + The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Directory ownership sane + Filenames are valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review