Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-31 19:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > > dachary | poker-interface is a shared library (really a python module but a > shared library) Considering where it is placed on disk.. doesn't this mean you need to run ldconfig in the postinstall scriptlet? What is confusing is why its placed in /usr/lib/poker-network/poker-interface instead of under /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pokerclient2d ? I don't think its really meant to be in the general ldconfig path. If its meant as a library to be used from python bindings only, its best to place it into the python module tree of interest. There are several examples of this sort of .so inclusion in the python module directory already in Fedora space, python-numeric being one specific case. And shouldn't the filename end with the .so extention for clarity? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review