Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scigraphica - Scientific application for data analysis and technical graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220968 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-31 18:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > rpmlint is giving 2 warnings for the main package - looks like you need a devel > subpackage adding > > W: scigraphica devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/pixmaps/scigraphica/stock_pixmaps.h > W: scigraphica devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/pixmaps/scigraphica/pixmaps.h > The rpmlint warnings can be ignored as those *.h are just listings of the contained pixmaps, I don't think they are being used to build anything. I've corrected the package not to own %{_libdir}/%{name} (already owned by libscigraphical) but it sub-directory that it creates. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/scigraphica/scigraphica-2.1.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review