Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-31 13:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Clarifiation: > > Are we running counter to the python module naming scheme in the naming guidance? > > Shouldnt it be python-poker-network and python-poker-client-lib because these > are primarily python modules which can be used to develop multiple applications? Let me get clarification on upstream with this. I think debian has the same policy, and upstream packages for debian so let me see what they say. I'll get back to you on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review