[Bug 221039] Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aria2 - High speed download utility with resuming and segmented downloading.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221039


belegdol@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From belegdol@xxxxxxxxx  2006-12-31 08:59 EST -------
- MUST: rpmlint is silent
- MUST: Package is named well
- MUST: Spec file name matches the package name
- MUST: Package meets packaging guidelines
- MUST: Pachage is licensed with GPL
- MUST: License field matches actual license
- MUST: COPYING file is included in %doc
- MUST: Spec is written in English, most probably American (I am not that
familiar with the differences to be 100% sure)
- MUST: I can understand the spec file
- MUST: MD5 sums match
- MUST: Package build in mock (fc6/i386)
- MUST: I can't check other architectures
- MUST: All deps are listed in BR
- MUST: %find_lang is used
- MUST: Package does not contain shared libs
- MUST: Package is not relocatable
- MUST: Directory ownership is ok
- MUST: There are no duplicates in %files
- MUST: Permissions are OK
- MUST: Clean section is present
- MUST: Macros are used consistently
- MUST: Package contains code
- MUST: There is no large documentation
- MUST: %doc is not required at runtime
- MUST: There is no headers nor static libs
- MUST: No pkgconfig files
- MUST: There is no shared libs
- MUST: There is no -devel subpackage
- MUST: There is no libtool archives
- MUST: Not a GUI app
- MUST: Pachage does not own dirs owned by other packages

SHOULD Items:
- SHOULD: License is included
- SHOULD: There are not translantions
- SHOULD: Package builds in mock (fc6/i386)
- SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
- SHOULD: Package works (smoke tested on fc6/i386)
- SHOULD: Scriptlets are not used
- SHOULD: There is no devel subpackage
- SHOULD: There are no pkgconfig files

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]