Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greylistd - Greylisting daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220891 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-30 20:45 EST ------- This is not an official review, I'm looking for a sponsor. rpmlint for SRPM returns this: W: greylistd summary-ended-with-dot Greylisting daemon. W: greylistd no-url-tag E: greylistd unknown-key GPG#66534c2b W: greylistd strange-permission greylistd.init 0755 W: greylistd prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig, /sbin/service Package fails to build (in mock too - FC6 i386): http://pastebin.ca/297379 Prefered BuildRoot is %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Maybe you should use spaces or tabs to make specfile preamble more legible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review