Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Sieve - Communication with timsieved Alias: pear-Net-Sieve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220999 chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-30 19:04 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output: W: php-pear-Net-Sieve no-documentation permissible, no documentation - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - source package does not include license file - spec written in American english - spec file is legible - package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependices listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - packge owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - contains code - no large documentation - no %doc - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no library files - no need for devel subpackage - no .la files - not a GUI app needing a .desktop file - packages shares directory ownership with other Net packages. Acceptable for pear packages APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review