[Bug 684511] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached - Cursor class with built-in caching support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684511

Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #9 from Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-05-12 08:30:15 EDT ---
- rpmlint OK
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK

resolvedeps-f16 perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached-1.001001-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok.

rpm -qp --provides perl-
perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-RequireSSL-0.04-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 
perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached-1.001001-1.fc16.noarch.rpm

rpm -qp --provides perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached-1.001001-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
perl(DBIx::Class::Cursor::Cached) = 1.001001
perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached = 1.001001-1.fc16

rpm -qp --requires perl-DBIx-Class-Cursor-Cached-1.001001-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
perl(Carp::Clan) >= 6.0
perl(DBIx::Class) >= 0.08124
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)  
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
perl >= 0:5.008001
perl(Digest::SHA1)  
perl(Storable)  
perl(strict)  
perl(vars)  
perl(warnings)  
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

(For the record it would build fine in rawhide. Older Fedora would need updates
of packages).

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]