Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librfid - Free Software RFID library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221010 bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-30 14:25 EST ------- MD5Sum: 695e7f30f570a08407e42ed278ca2fe3 librfid-0.1.0.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical. * License field in spec, match tarball license. * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros. * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners. * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines. * rpmlint produces no errors. * Package builds in Mock fine. * Package install and uninstalls cleanly on FC6. Minor: * I really don't think you need to add the same docs that are in the main package to the devel package. This isn't a blocker, but I would drop them. +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review