Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-30 11:35 EST ------- I tried to run rpmlint for your newest package and I got: E: isomaster description-line-too-long ISO Master: an easy to use GUI CD image editor. It allows to extract files from an ISO, add files to an ISO, and create bootable ISOs - all in a graphical user interface. E: isomaster description-line-too-long ISO Master: an easy to use GUI CD image editor. It allows to extract files from an ISO, add files to an ISO, and create bootable ISOs - all in a graphical user interface. W: isomaster macro-in-%changelog _datadir In order to get rid of the first two ones you have to split your %description. One line inside it may be max 79 characters long. To remove a warning just double % character, so instead of %{_datadir} write %%{_datadir} etc. Also I noticed that gtk2 dependency ought to be removed completely. Running rpm -qpR for RPM gives me following result: gtk2 libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) As you can see, there is libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 file. $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 gtk2-2.10.4-4.fc6.x86_64 So it is owned by gtk2 package. It means you can remove that dependency without concern. (In reply to comment #4)) > Hopefully good enough to find a sponsor :) It does look for me that if you fix the last issues I mentioned above, this package surely will be good enough. Remember to make unoffical reviews of another packages to let sponsors pay attention to you ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review