[Bug 697680] Review Request: surf-geometry - visualizer for real algebraic geometry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697680

Mario BlÃttermann <mariobl@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |mariobl@xxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #6 from Mario BlÃttermann <mariobl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-05-08 06:51:14 EDT ---
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3057965

$ rpmlint -v *
surf-geometry.src: I: checking
surf-geometry.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codimension -> co
dimension, co-dimension, dimensional
surf-geometry.src: I: checking-url http://surf.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10
seconds)
surf-geometry.src: I: checking-url
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/surf/surf/1.0.6/surf-1.0.6.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
surf-geometry.i686: I: checking
surf-geometry.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codimension -> co
dimension, co-dimension, dimensional
surf-geometry.i686: I: checking-url http://surf.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10
seconds)
surf-geometry.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/surf-geometry-1.0.6/COPYING
surf-geometry.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary surf-geometry
surf-geometry-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
surf-geometry-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://surf.sourceforge.net/
(timeout 10 seconds)
surf-geometry.spec: I: checking-url
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/surf/surf/1.0.6/surf-1.0.6.tar.gz
(timeout 10 seconds)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings.

OK so far.

---------------------------------
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
---------------------------------

[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
    GPLv2+
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
    $ md5sum *
    598142168e940a818c7b5a7a66b35082  surf-1.0.6.tar.gz
    598142168e940a818c7b5a7a66b35082  surf-1.0.6.tar.gz.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
    - Succesful Koji build available.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[x] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
    %{_datadir}/surf-geometry
    just put a / after this entry to let the package own this folder and its
content.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
    separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...
[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
    See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway)
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
    I assume the packager has tested it.
[.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[+] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]