[Bug 681976] Review Request: openfst - weighted finite-state transducer library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681976

--- Comment #5 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-05-04 00:58:38 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> For the hardcoded-library-path it's not that obvious exactly what is going
> on but by x86_64 builds end up in the correct location so probably fine.

Some of the libraries need to be linked against each other.  That is the way I
came up with to accomplish the linking.  There may be a prettier way to do it. 
In any case, as you say, once the libraries are actually installed, all is
well.

> determinization is probably okay in american-english I would have 
> thought even it makes me cringe, maybe determining is better?

Determinization is the process of converting a nondeterministic automaton into
a deterministic automaton.  That word is the one chosen by finite automata
theorists, so it is correct, although it understandably is not in the standard
dictionary.

> automa seems to be included twice so is probably intentional.

You mean "automata", right?  Yes, that is the plural of automaton.

> You may want to at least submit bugs upstream about those exits.

Will do.  I hate it when library authors do that.

> These are links from -devel package to the main package so they are 
> all satisfied. You can get rid of the warnings of course by making non relative
> with 
> pushd
> 
> popd.
> 
> which would make the rpmlint a lot cleaner.

But it wouldn't do any good, since ldconfig would just put them back the way
they were.  Those links are correct; rpmlint just can't cope with a .so in a
-devel package pointing to a .so.* in another package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]