Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-29 23:09 EST ------- A couple of comments: This package has rpath problems: E: qpidd binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/qpidd ['/usr/lib64'] Loads of undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints from the installed package: W: qpidc undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libqpidclient.so.0.1.0 _ZTIN4qpid7framing11BodyHandlerE W: qpidc undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libqpidclient.so.0.1.0 _ZTIN4qpid3sys8RunnableE W: qpidc undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libqpidclient.so.0.1.0 _ZNK4qpid7framing13AMQMethodBody6encodeERNS0_6BufferE and 161 others. Picking nits, I know, but: BuildReqires: cppunit is redundant. Requires: apr is also redundant; rpm finds the libapr-1.so.0 dependency automatically. Oddly, it doesn't find the boost dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review