Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybluez - python API for the bluez bluetooth stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218678 kevin@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-29 18:30 EST ------- 1, 2, 3 all look fixed up in the package in comment #5. On item 4: rpm happily looks for .so files anywhere in the package and then automagically "Provides" them in the rpm namespace. I think that rpm should instead only do this with .so files when they are in the standard ldconfig directories. The only thing that can really use the _bluetooth.so thats provided here is this package, so the provides just adds to the rpm provides namespace. It's not a blocker though, since it doesn't hurt anything. If the .so here was bluetooth.so that would be a problem... since bluez-libs-devel already provides that. Hopefully that makes some sense to someone aside from me. ;) I don't see any other blockers here... I will go ahead and APPROVE this package and sponsor you. You can continue the process from here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 Don't forget to close this review request NEXTRELASE once everything has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review