Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694287 --- Comment #50 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-27 16:18:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #49) > (In reply to comment #47) > <snip> > > > Done. While we on the subject of sub-packages. Should we also make a separate > > -doc package? > > No I don't think that is necessary, given that the docs are not all that large. > (In reply to comment #48) > > Went ahead and created a -doc package. > > > > Hehe, well if you prefer having the htdocs in a separate sub package that is > fine. note that things like README and LICENSE must be in the main package > though. I figured since most people will not be direct users (this package will just be a dependency of the program they are actually using), that it would be good to separate the documentation. Yup, I was careful to only move htdocs to the sub-package. > > Also, I ran rpmlint on all the resulting packages and saw something new: > > > > openCOLLADA-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources > > > > Ah, yes this is caused by you using cmake rather then %cmake when invoking > cmake, > I missed that. This causes rpm_opt_flags to not be used, causing this amongst > other issues. Fixed and rebuilding now. Between taking the smp_flags off and adding whatever the cmake macro adds it's taking MUCH longer to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review