Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696249 --- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2011-04-27 10:04:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Also this license information is just an annotation--for kupfer itself "GPLv2+ > and GPLv3+" is nonsense, it's distributed using the terms of GPLv3 in reality. We have to check the licensing information provided by the tarball and take it seriously. object.svg seems to be derived from a file licensed under GPLv2 only, so object.svg is also under GPLv2 only. (GPLv2+ was a typo, sorry). The application itself is GPLv3+. However, the License field of the package must reflect the licenses of the files in the package. And as there is at least one separate file under GPLv2, we have to mention this as requested by the guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review